Keenon T10vspudu T300
Keenon T10 leads on 4 of 7 dimensions — strongest on deployment readiness.
T10
3 wins
T300
1 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 85Deployment readiness78
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 82Price accessibility76
- 78ROI clarity72
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 72Labor replacement68
- 40 kg (10 kg per tray across 4 layers)Payload300 kg (661 lbs); 400 kg in tow mode
- 0.1–1.0 m/s adjustable; 0.8 m/s at full load on dry roadSpeedMaximum 1.2 m/s
- 6 hours nominal; up to 10 hours under optimal conditionsBattery12 h (no load), 6 h (fully loaded)
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 82Environment fit80
- 76Future potential70
- 486 × 555 × 1,399 mm (W × D × H)Footprint780 × 500 × 1350 mm (W × D × H)
T10 · Best for
200+ seat hotpot or casual dining chains during peak dinner service (one robot per 4–5 tables)
T300 · Best for
Automotive parts fabrication — autonomous tray delivery between assembly stations (6 h continuous, 400 kg tow mode)
Final judgment
If immediate deployment is the priority, choose T10. If the goal is to be ready when T300's capabilities mature, track it.