Keenon T10vsOmron MD-900
Close call. T10 and MD-900 trade wins across the matrix.
T10
1 wins
MD-900
1 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 85Deployment readiness88
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 82Price accessibility23
- 78ROI clarity75
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 72Labor replacement78
- 40 kg (10 kg per tray across 4 layers)Payload900 kg
- 0.1–1.0 m/s adjustable; 0.8 m/s at full load on dry roadSpeed1.8 m/s
- 6 hours nominal; up to 10 hours under optimal conditionsBattery8 hours (5%–95% charge in <30 minutes)
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 82Environment fit82
- 76Future potential72
- 486 × 555 × 1,399 mm (W × D × H)Footprint944 mm (W) x 1194 mm (L) x 320 mm (H)
T10 · Best for
200+ seat hotpot or casual dining chains during peak dinner service (one robot per 4–5 tables)
MD-900 · Best for
High-volume pallet transport in automotive assembly lines (sub-10 m² footprint, <2 m/s speed constraint)
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.