Keenon T10vsMiR MiR250
For order-picking cart transport in multi-level fulfillment centers (tti case study: 5 units moving 250 kg shelves autonomously across distribution centers)., MiR250 is easier to deploy today — T10 is the longer bet on capability.
T10
2 wins
MiR250
2 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 85Deployment readiness95
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 82Price accessibility56
- 78ROI clarity80
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 72Labor replacement75
- 40 kg (10 kg per tray across 4 layers)Payload250 kg
- 0.1–1.0 m/s adjustable; 0.8 m/s at full load on dry roadSpeed2 m/sec (7.2 km/hour)
- 6 hours nominal; up to 10 hours under optimal conditionsBattery10 hours
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 82Environment fit78
- 76Future potential70
- 486 × 555 × 1,399 mm (W × D × H)Footprint800 × 580 × 300 mm (W × D × H)
T10 · Best for
200+ seat hotpot or casual dining chains during peak dinner service (one robot per 4–5 tables)
MiR250 · Best for
Order-picking cart transport in multi-level fulfillment centers (TTI case study: 5 units moving 250 kg shelves autonomously across distribution centers).
Final judgment
If immediate deployment is the priority, choose MiR250. If the goal is to be ready when T10's capabilities mature, track it.