Keenon T10vsKeenon T9
Keenon T9 leads on 5 of 7 dimensions — strongest on deployment readiness.
T10
0 wins
T9
4 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 85Deployment readiness92
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 82Price accessibility87
- 78ROI clarity88
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 72Labor replacement85
- 40 kg (10 kg per tray across 4 layers)Payload40 kg
- 0.1–1.0 m/s adjustable; 0.8 m/s at full load on dry roadSpeed0.8 m/s
- 6 hours nominal; up to 10 hours under optimal conditionsBattery18 hours
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 82Environment fit90
- 76Future potential75
- 486 × 555 × 1,399 mm (W × D × H)Footprint500 × 527 × 1,266 mm (W × D × H)
T10 · Best for
200+ seat hotpot or casual dining chains during peak dinner service (one robot per 4–5 tables)
T9 · Best for
200+ seat banquet halls during wedding/event service rushes — robot handles multi-table delivery across wide aisles with zero staff training friction
Final judgment
If immediate deployment is the priority, choose T9. If the goal is to be ready when T10's capabilities mature, track it.