Keenon T10-Chefvspudu t300
Close call. T10-Chef and t300 trade wins across the matrix.
T10-Chef
1 wins
t300
1 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 82Deployment readiness78
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 81Price accessibility76
- 72ROI clarity72
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 68Labor replacement68
- 40 kg (88 lbs)Payload300 kg (661 lbs); 400 kg in tow mode
- 1 m/s maximumSpeedMaximum 1.2 m/s
- 8 to 12.5 hours (usage dependent)Battery12 h (no load), 6 h (fully loaded)
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 78Environment fit80
- 70Future potential70
- 486 × 555 × 1,399 mmFootprint780 × 500 × 1350 mm (W × D × H)
T10-Chef · Best for
High-volume hotpot or BBQ restaurants with open-seating layouts (10+ deliveries per hour during dinner rush)
t300 · Best for
Automotive parts fabrication — autonomous tray delivery between assembly stations (6 h continuous, 400 kg tow mode)
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

