Kawada Robotics Nextage FillievsNeura Robotics MAV
Close call. Nextage Fillie and MAV trade wins across the matrix.
Nextage Fillie
2 wins
MAV
2 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 85Deployment readiness75
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 30Price accessibility78
- 65ROI clarity70
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 70Labor replacement72
- 1.5 kg per armPayloadMAV 500: up to 500 kg; MAV 1500: up to 1,500 kg
- Faster than conventional Nextage NXASpeedUp to 1.5 m/s
- —BatteryMAV 500: up to 7.5 hours; MAV 1500: 10 hours running time, 2 hours charging time
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 80Environment fit78
- 75Future potential68
- 714 × 597 × 270 mmFootprintMAV 500: 678 × 1255 × 294 mm; MAV 1500: 910 × 1530 × 293 mm
Nextage Fillie · Best for
Electronics assembly in mixed human-robot cells with frequent changeovers
MAV · Best for
Automotive parts supply loop in restricted-aisle assembly plants (400+ parts/shift).
Final judgment
If immediate deployment is the priority, choose Nextage Fillie. If the goal is to be ready when MAV's capabilities mature, track it.