Kawada Robotics Nextage FillievsKeenon W3
Keenon W3 leads on 4 of 7 dimensions — strongest on deployment readiness.
Nextage Fillie
0 wins
W3
3 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 85Deployment readiness92
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 30Price accessibility73
- 65ROI clarity88
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 70Labor replacement85
- 1.5 kg per armPayload20 kg (44 lbs)
- Faster than conventional Nextage NXASpeed0.8 m/s (2.63 ft/s)
- —BatteryUp to 12 hours
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 80Environment fit80
- 75Future potential72
- 714 × 597 × 270 mmFootprint459 × 549 × 1,081 mm (W × D × H)
Nextage Fillie · Best for
Electronics assembly in mixed human-robot cells with frequent changeovers
W3 · Best for
Hotel room service across multiple floors, reducing customer wait times
Final judgment
If immediate deployment is the priority, choose W3. If the goal is to be ready when Nextage Fillie's capabilities mature, track it.