Franka Robotics Franka Research 3vsPAL Robotics TIAGo Base

Franka Robotics Franka Research 3 leads on 4 of 7 dimensions — strongest on deployment readiness.

Franka Research 3
3 wins
vs
TIAGo Base
1 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Franka Research 3
  • 85
    Deployment readiness
    72
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Franka Research 3
  • 72
    Price accessibility
    33
  • 70
    ROI clarity
    65

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

TIAGo Base
  • 60
    Labor replacement
    68
  • 3 kg
    Payload
    70 kg
  • Up to 2 m/s at TCP; joint velocity A1-A4: 150 deg/s, A5-A7: 301 deg/s
    Speed
    1 m/s
  • Mains-powered (no battery)
    Battery

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Franka Research 3
  • 75
    Environment fit
    78
  • 80
    Future potential
    71
  • Arm ~18.3 kg; Control 355 × 483 × 89 mm (D × W × H)
    Footprint
    Footprint Ø54 cm
Franka Research 3 · Best for

University robotics labs developing grasping algorithms with force-feedback learning

TIAGo Base · Best for

Indoor deliveries in industrial plants, hospitals, and offices

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose Franka Research 3. If the goal is to be ready when TIAGo Base's capabilities mature, track it.

More head-to-head