Fourier Intelligence GR-3vsPollen Robotics Reachy 2
Close call. GR-3 and Reachy 2 trade wins across the matrix.
GR-3
1 wins
Reachy 2
1 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 72Deployment readiness75
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 49Price accessibility51
- 58ROI clarity55
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 45Labor replacement45
- 71 kg total weight; no single-arm lifting capacity disclosedPayload3 kg per arm
- 5 km/hSpeed—
- 3 hours per charge; dual hot-swappable batteries enable 6 hours continuous operationBattery—
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 78Environment fit80
- 75Future potential85
- Height 165 cm; width and depth not disclosedFootprintHeight 4.46 to 5.45 feet (mobile base variant)
GR-3 · Best for
Senior living communities: companionship, fall monitoring, medication reminders via natural voice.
Reachy 2 · Best for
Embodied AI training with demonstration learning and real-time teleoperation data capture for manipulation models
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.