Fourier Intelligence GR-2vsUBTECH walker C
For international expo pavilions (live deployment at expo 2025 osaka as china pavilion tour guide), walker C is easier to deploy today — GR-2 is the longer bet on capability.
GR-2
1 wins
walker C
3 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 58Deployment readiness68
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 32Price accessibility66
- 42ROI clarity52
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 35Labor replacement45
- 3 kg (single-arm load capacity)Payload5 kg per arm
- —SpeedUp to 6 km/h walking/jogging
- Up to 2 hoursBatteryUp to 4 hours on standby; 2 hours walking, 4 hours standing per charge
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 72Environment fit75
- 78Future potential72
- 175 cm heightFootprintApproximately 1630 mm height
GR-2 · Best for
Embodied AI research on grasping, force feedback, and sim-to-real transfer
walker C · Best for
International expo pavilions (live deployment at Expo 2025 Osaka as China Pavilion tour guide)
Final judgment
If immediate deployment is the priority, choose walker C. If the goal is to be ready when GR-2's capabilities mature, track it.

