Figure AI Figure 02vsPAL Robotics TIAGO

Figure AI Figure 02 leads on 3 of 7 dimensions — strongest on ROI clarity.

Figure 02
1 wins
vs
TIAGO
0 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Even
  • 78
    Deployment readiness
    78
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Even
  • 31
    Price accessibility
    53
  • 62
    ROI clarity
    45

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

Even
  • 72
    Labor replacement
    35
  • 20 kg (standard); 25 kg (hand-specific carrying capacity)
    Payload
    70 kg base; 150 kg with AI variant; 3 kg arm fully extended
  • 1.2 m/s walking speed; 3 m/s max reported
    Speed
    1.5 m/s max
  • 5 hours continuous operation; 2.25 kWh lithium-ion torso battery with 1.5-hour rapid charging
    Battery
    36V 20Ah Li-Ion (runtime not specified)

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Figure 02
  • 75
    Environment fit
    72
  • 82
    Future potential
    76
  • Height 168 cm (5'6")
    Footprint
    54 cm diameter / 30 cm height (base); dual-arm variant TIAGo++ reaches 1.75 m high
Figure 02 · Best for

Sheet-metal loading in automotive assembly — 2-second cycle precision on BMW X3 production line, 90,000+ parts handled in 11-month pilot

TIAGO · Best for

Research platform for mobile manipulation and human-robot interaction studies in academic labs

Final judgment

Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

More head-to-head