Figure AI Figure 02vsGhost Robotics Vision 60

Close call. Figure 02 and Vision 60 trade wins across the matrix.

Figure 02
2 wins
vs
Vision 60
1 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Even
  • 78
    Deployment readiness
    78
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Figure 02
  • 31
    Price accessibility
    29
  • 62
    ROI clarity
    55

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

Figure 02
  • 72
    Labor replacement
    45
  • 20 kg (standard); 25 kg (hand-specific carrying capacity)
    Payload
    10 kg
  • 1.2 m/s walking speed; 3 m/s max reported
    Speed
    Max 3.0 m/s; standard walk 1 m/s
  • 5 hours continuous operation; 2.25 kWh lithium-ion torso battery with 1.5-hour rapid charging
    Battery
    3.15 hours continuous walking at 0.9 m/s; 10 km (terrain and payload dependent) or 21 hours standby time

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Vision 60
  • 75
    Environment fit
    92
  • 82
    Future potential
    80
  • Height 168 cm (5'6")
    Footprint
    Unknown
Figure 02 · Best for

Sheet-metal loading in automotive assembly — 2-second cycle precision on BMW X3 production line, 90,000+ parts handled in 11-month pilot

Vision 60 · Best for

Border patrol and perimeter security at military installations where GPS-denied navigation and 21-hour standby monitoring are required.

Final judgment

Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

More head-to-head