Figure 03vsUBTECH walker C

For international expo pavilions (live deployment at expo 2025 osaka as china pavilion tour guide), walker C is easier to deploy today — 03 is the longer bet on capability.

Figure 03
Figure
03
$20K–$20K
UBTECH walker C
UBTECH
walker C
$41K–$41K
03
2 wins
vs
walker C
1 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

walker C
  • 62
    Deployment readiness
    68
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

03
  • 80
    Price accessibility
    66
  • 48
    ROI clarity
    52

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

03
  • 71
    Labor replacement
    45
  • 20 kg total carry payload
    Payload
    5 kg per arm
  • 1.2 m/s (4.3 km/h)
    Speed
    Up to 6 km/h walking/jogging
  • approximately 16-hour battery life
    Battery
    Up to 4 hours on standby; 2 hours walking, 4 hours standing per charge

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Even
  • 66
    Environment fit
    75
  • 82
    Future potential
    72
  • Unknown
    Footprint
    Approximately 1630 mm height
03 · Best for

Industrial assembly lines and automotive factory floors (BMW partnerships active; controlled environment)

walker C · Best for

International expo pavilions (live deployment at Expo 2025 Osaka as China Pavilion tour guide)

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose walker C. If the goal is to be ready when 03's capabilities mature, track it.

Open interactive comparison03walker C

More head-to-head