Figure 03vsPAL Robotics TIAGO

For research platform for mobile manipulation and human-robot interaction studies in academic labs, TIAGO is easier to deploy today — 03 is the longer bet on capability.

03
1 wins
vs
TIAGO
1 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

TIAGO
  • 62
    Deployment readiness
    78
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

03
  • 80
    Price accessibility
    53
  • 48
    ROI clarity
    45

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

Even
  • 71
    Labor replacement
    35
  • 20 kg total carry payload
    Payload
    70 kg base; 150 kg with AI variant; 3 kg arm fully extended
  • 1.2 m/s (4.3 km/h)
    Speed
    1.5 m/s max
  • approximately 16-hour battery life
    Battery
    36V 20Ah Li-Ion (runtime not specified)

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Even
  • 66
    Environment fit
    72
  • 82
    Future potential
    76
  • Unknown
    Footprint
    54 cm diameter / 30 cm height (base); dual-arm variant TIAGo++ reaches 1.75 m high
03 · Best for

Industrial assembly lines and automotive factory floors (BMW partnerships active; controlled environment)

TIAGO · Best for

Research platform for mobile manipulation and human-robot interaction studies in academic labs

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose TIAGO. If the goal is to be ready when 03's capabilities mature, track it.

More head-to-head