FANUC M-2000iAvsUniversal Robots UR30

Close call. M-2000iA and UR30 trade wins across the matrix.

M-2000iA
1 wins
vs
UR30
2 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Even
  • 90
    Deployment readiness
    88
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

UR30
  • 10
    Price accessibility
    48
  • 85
    ROI clarity
    82

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

M-2000iA
  • 85
    Labor replacement
    79
  • 900–2300 kg (variant-dependent; M-2000iA/900L, /1200, /1700L, /2300)
    Payload
    30 kg (66.1 lbs), 35 kg (77.1 lbs) with boundary conditions
  • 60–130° per second (max axis speed, variant-dependent)
    Speed
    Unknown
  • Not applicable (mains-powered, industrial AC supply)
    Battery
    Not applicable (arm-only, plugged to control box)

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

UR30
  • 75
    Environment fit
    75
  • 65
    Future potential
    81
  • M-2000iA/2300 base footprint 1540 × 1480 mm; full arm reach 3734–4683 mm horizontal, 6200 mm vertical
    Footprint
    Compact footprint of Ø 245 mm; height and depth vary with configuration; 1300 mm reach
M-2000iA · Best for

Automotive and metal industry heavy parts handling and car body transfer

UR30 · Best for

Heavy-parts palletizing (20–30 kg boxes) on automotive or food production lines where floor space is premium

Final judgment

Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

More head-to-head