FANUC LR Mate 200iDvsUniversal Robots UR30

Close call. LR Mate 200iD and UR30 trade wins across the matrix.

LR Mate 200iD
0 wins
vs
UR30
1 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Even
  • 88
    Deployment readiness
    88
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Even
  • 81
    Price accessibility
    48
  • 75
    ROI clarity
    82

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

UR30
  • 62
    Labor replacement
    79
  • 7 kg
    Payload
    30 kg (66.1 lbs), 35 kg (77.1 lbs) with boundary conditions
  • 11 m/s TCP max
    Speed
    Unknown
  • Battery
    Not applicable (arm-only, plugged to control box)

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Even
  • 80
    Environment fit
    75
  • 65
    Future potential
    81
  • 190 × 190 mm footprint; full envelope length 997 mm
    Footprint
    Compact footprint of Ø 245 mm; height and depth vary with configuration; 1300 mm reach
LR Mate 200iD · Best for

Electronics component placement and soldering in compact, multi-robot cells

UR30 · Best for

Heavy-parts palletizing (20–30 kg boxes) on automotive or food production lines where floor space is premium

Final judgment

Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

More head-to-head