FANUC LR Mate 200iDvspudu t300

For electronics component placement and soldering in compact, multi-robot cells, LR Mate 200iD is easier to deploy today — t300 is the longer bet on capability.

FANUC LR Mate 200iD
FANUC
LR Mate 200iD
$18K–$20K
pudu t300
pudu
t300
$22K–$26K
LR Mate 200iD
2 wins
vs
t300
2 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

LR Mate 200iD
  • 88
    Deployment readiness
    78
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

LR Mate 200iD
  • 81
    Price accessibility
    76
  • 75
    ROI clarity
    72

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

t300
  • 62
    Labor replacement
    68
  • 7 kg
    Payload
    300 kg (661 lbs); 400 kg in tow mode
  • 11 m/s TCP max
    Speed
    Maximum 1.2 m/s
  • —
    Battery
    12 h (no load), 6 h (fully loaded)

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

t300
  • 80
    Environment fit
    80
  • 65
    Future potential
    70
  • 190 × 190 mm footprint; full envelope length 997 mm
    Footprint
    780 × 500 × 1350 mm (W × D × H)
LR Mate 200iD · Best for

Electronics component placement and soldering in compact, multi-robot cells

t300 · Best for

Automotive parts fabrication — autonomous tray delivery between assembly stations (6 h continuous, 400 kg tow mode)

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose LR Mate 200iD. If the goal is to be ready when t300's capabilities mature, track it.

Open interactive comparisonLR Mate 200iDt300

More head-to-head