FANUC LR Mate 200iDvsKeenon W3

Keenon W3 leads on 3 of 7 dimensions — strongest on ROI clarity.

LR Mate 200iD
0 wins
vs
W3
2 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Even
  • 88
    Deployment readiness
    92
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Even
  • 81
    Price accessibility
    73
  • 75
    ROI clarity
    88

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

W3
  • 62
    Labor replacement
    85
  • 7 kg
    Payload
    20 kg (44 lbs)
  • 11 m/s TCP max
    Speed
    0.8 m/s (2.63 ft/s)
  • Battery
    Up to 12 hours

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

W3
  • 80
    Environment fit
    80
  • 65
    Future potential
    72
  • 190 × 190 mm footprint; full envelope length 997 mm
    Footprint
    459 × 549 × 1,081 mm (W × D × H)
LR Mate 200iD · Best for

Electronics component placement and soldering in compact, multi-robot cells

W3 · Best for

Hotel room service across multiple floors, reducing customer wait times

Final judgment

Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

More head-to-head