Double Robotics Double 3vsKawada Robotics Nextage Fillie
Close call. Double 3 and Nextage Fillie trade wins across the matrix.
Double 3
1 wins
Nextage Fillie
3 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 78Deployment readiness85
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 95Price accessibility30
- 72ROI clarity65
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 55Labor replacement70
- —Payload1.5 kg per arm
- —SpeedFaster than conventional Nextage NXA
- 4 hours on single charge (2 hour recharge time)Battery—
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 68Environment fit80
- 71Future potential75
- Height 119–150 cm (47–60 inches, adjustable); width and depth not specifiedFootprint714 × 597 × 270 mm
Double 3 · Best for
Hybrid university classrooms blending remote and in-person students
Nextage Fillie · Best for
Electronics assembly in mixed human-robot cells with frequent changeovers
Final judgment
If immediate deployment is the priority, choose Nextage Fillie. If the goal is to be ready when Double 3's capabilities mature, track it.

