Doosan Robotics M0609vsKawada Robotics Nextage Fillie

Close call. M0609 and Nextage Fillie trade wins across the matrix.

Doosan Robotics M0609
Doosan Robotics
M0609
$36K–$36K
Kawada Robotics Nextage Fillie
Kawada Robotics
Nextage Fillie
Quote needed
M0609
2 wins
vs
Nextage Fillie
1 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Even
  • 88
    Deployment readiness
    85
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

M0609
  • 69
    Price accessibility
    30
  • 82
    ROI clarity
    65

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

M0609
  • 72
    Labor replacement
    70
  • 6 kg
    Payload
    1.5 kg per arm
  • 1 m/s TCP speed
    Speed
    Faster than conventional Nextage NXA
  • AC-powered (no battery)
    Battery
    —

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Nextage Fillie
  • 75
    Environment fit
    80
  • 72
    Future potential
    75
  • 900 mm working radius, compact mounting posture
    Footprint
    714 × 597 × 270 mm
M0609 · Best for

Screw-tightening and gear assembly on automotive harnesses in <5 m² cells

Nextage Fillie · Best for

Electronics assembly in mixed human-robot cells with frequent changeovers

Final judgment

Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

Open interactive comparisonM0609Nextage Fillie

More head-to-head