Dobot HexplorervsPAL Robotics TIAGo Base
For indoor deliveries in industrial plants, hospitals, and offices, TIAGo Base is easier to deploy today — Hexplorer is the longer bet on capability.
Hexplorer
0 wins
TIAGo Base
2 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 62Deployment readiness72
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 81Price accessibility33
- 45ROI clarity65
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 35Labor replacement68
- 10 kg (rated), 15 kg (max)Payload70 kg
- 1.8 m/s max walking speedSpeed1 m/s
- 504 Wh battery; 2.5 h runtimeBattery—
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 72Environment fit78
- 78Future potential71
- Standing: 86.3 × 47 × 48 cm; Folded: 73.4 × 47 × 24.6 cmFootprintFootprint Ø54 cm
Hexplorer · Best for
Utility tunnel and underground infrastructure inspection with 10 kg sensor payload
TIAGo Base · Best for
Indoor deliveries in industrial plants, hospitals, and offices
Final judgment
If immediate deployment is the priority, choose TIAGo Base. If the goal is to be ready when Hexplorer's capabilities mature, track it.