Dobot HexplorervsOmron MD-900

For high-volume pallet transport in automotive assembly lines (sub-10 m² footprint, <2 m/s speed constraint), MD-900 is easier to deploy today — Hexplorer is the longer bet on capability.

Dobot Hexplorer
Dobot
Hexplorer
$17K–$23K
Omron MD-900
Omron
MD-900
$150K–$250K
Hexplorer
0 wins
vs
MD-900
2 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

MD-900
  • 62
    Deployment readiness
    88
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Even
  • 81
    Price accessibility
    23
  • 45
    ROI clarity
    75

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

MD-900
  • 35
    Labor replacement
    78
  • 10 kg (rated), 15 kg (max)
    Payload
    900 kg
  • 1.8 m/s max walking speed
    Speed
    1.8 m/s
  • 504 Wh battery; 2.5 h runtime
    Battery
    8 hours (5%–95% charge in <30 minutes)

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Even
  • 72
    Environment fit
    82
  • 78
    Future potential
    72
  • Standing: 86.3 × 47 × 48 cm; Folded: 73.4 × 47 × 24.6 cm
    Footprint
    944 mm (W) x 1194 mm (L) x 320 mm (H)
Hexplorer · Best for

Utility tunnel and underground infrastructure inspection with 10 kg sensor payload

MD-900 · Best for

High-volume pallet transport in automotive assembly lines (sub-10 m² footprint, <2 m/s speed constraint)

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose MD-900. If the goal is to be ready when Hexplorer's capabilities mature, track it.

Open interactive comparisonHexplorerMD-900

More head-to-head