Dobot HexplorervsNeura Robotics MAV
For automotive parts supply loop in restricted-aisle assembly plants (400+ parts/shift)., MAV is easier to deploy today — Hexplorer is the longer bet on capability.
Hexplorer
0 wins
MAV
3 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 62Deployment readiness75
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 81Price accessibility78
- 45ROI clarity70
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 35Labor replacement72
- 10 kg (rated), 15 kg (max)PayloadMAV 500: up to 500 kg; MAV 1500: up to 1,500 kg
- 1.8 m/s max walking speedSpeedUp to 1.5 m/s
- 504 Wh battery; 2.5 h runtimeBatteryMAV 500: up to 7.5 hours; MAV 1500: 10 hours running time, 2 hours charging time
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 72Environment fit78
- 78Future potential68
- Standing: 86.3 × 47 × 48 cm; Folded: 73.4 × 47 × 24.6 cmFootprintMAV 500: 678 × 1255 × 294 mm; MAV 1500: 910 × 1530 × 293 mm
Hexplorer · Best for
Utility tunnel and underground infrastructure inspection with 10 kg sensor payload
MAV · Best for
Automotive parts supply loop in restricted-aisle assembly plants (400+ parts/shift).
Final judgment
If immediate deployment is the priority, choose MAV. If the goal is to be ready when Hexplorer's capabilities mature, track it.