DEEP Robotics LYNX M20vsPudu Robotics PUDU D9

DEEP Robotics LYNX M20 leads on 5 of 7 dimensions — strongest on deployment readiness.

LYNX M20
4 wins
vs
PUDU D9
0 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

LYNX M20
  • 72
    Deployment readiness
    25
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

LYNX M20
  • 51
    Price accessibility
    35
  • 58
    ROI clarity
    20

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

LYNX M20
  • 65
    Labor replacement
    45
  • 15 kg effective payload, 50 kg maximum load capacity
    Payload
    Exceeding 20 kg total (7-DoF per arm)
  • Maximum tested speed 5 m/s; maximum operating speed 2 m/s
    Speed
    Up to 2 m/s on flat surfaces
  • 3 hours unloaded (15 km range) or 2.5 hours fully loaded (12 km range); 1.5 h charging time
    Battery
    Up to 8 hours on a single charge with 15Ah battery system

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

LYNX M20
  • 78
    Environment fit
    50
  • 76
    Future potential
    75
  • 820 × 430 × 570 mm (W × D × H)
    Footprint
    ~600 × 500 × 1700 mm (estimated based on 170 cm height; not published)
LYNX M20 · Best for

Autonomous power substation patrol in rain/snow, avoiding high-voltage contact hazard

PUDU D9 · Best for

Hotel fetch-and-carry: guest room deliveries, towel replenishment, laundry transport across multiple floors.

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose LYNX M20. If the goal is to be ready when PUDU D9's capabilities mature, track it.

More head-to-head