DEEP Robotics LYNX M20vsPollen Robotics Reachy 2

Close call. LYNX M20 and Reachy 2 trade wins across the matrix.

LYNX M20
1 wins
vs
Reachy 2
1 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Even
  • 72
    Deployment readiness
    75
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Even
  • 51
    Price accessibility
    51
  • 58
    ROI clarity
    55

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

LYNX M20
  • 65
    Labor replacement
    45
  • 15 kg effective payload, 50 kg maximum load capacity
    Payload
    3 kg per arm
  • Maximum tested speed 5 m/s; maximum operating speed 2 m/s
    Speed
  • 3 hours unloaded (15 km range) or 2.5 hours fully loaded (12 km range); 1.5 h charging time
    Battery

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Reachy 2
  • 78
    Environment fit
    80
  • 76
    Future potential
    85
  • 820 × 430 × 570 mm (W × D × H)
    Footprint
    Height 4.46 to 5.45 feet (mobile base variant)
LYNX M20 · Best for

Autonomous power substation patrol in rain/snow, avoiding high-voltage contact hazard

Reachy 2 · Best for

Embodied AI training with demonstration learning and real-time teleoperation data capture for manipulation models

Final judgment

Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

More head-to-head