DEEP Robotics LYNX M20vsKepler Robotics Mechanical Qilin

DEEP Robotics LYNX M20 leads on 5 of 7 dimensions — strongest on deployment readiness.

LYNX M20
4 wins
vs
Mechanical Qilin
0 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

LYNX M20
  • 72
    Deployment readiness
    35
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

LYNX M20
  • 51
    Price accessibility
    30
  • 58
    ROI clarity
    25

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

LYNX M20
  • 65
    Labor replacement
    60
  • 15 kg effective payload, 50 kg maximum load capacity
    Payload
    approximately 1 ton
  • Maximum tested speed 5 m/s; maximum operating speed 2 m/s
    Speed
  • 3 hours unloaded (15 km range) or 2.5 hours fully loaded (12 km range); 1.5 h charging time
    Battery
    8-hour shift on one charge

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

LYNX M20
  • 78
    Environment fit
    70
  • 76
    Future potential
    75
  • 820 × 430 × 570 mm (W × D × H)
    Footprint
    2175 × 800 × 1630 mm (W × D × H)
LYNX M20 · Best for

Autonomous power substation patrol in rain/snow, avoiding high-voltage contact hazard

Mechanical Qilin · Best for

Mountain rescue resupply: transport food, medical kits, equipment on steep slopes where vehicles cannot reach

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose LYNX M20. If the goal is to be ready when Mechanical Qilin's capabilities mature, track it.

More head-to-head