DEEP Robotics Jueying X30vsPAL Robotics TIAGO
DEEP Robotics Jueying X30 leads on 3 of 7 dimensions — strongest on ROI clarity.
Jueying X30
2 wins
TIAGO
0 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 82Deployment readiness78
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 51Price accessibility53
- 76ROI clarity45
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 70Labor replacement35
- —Payload70 kg base; 150 kg with AI variant; 3 kg arm fully extended
- —Speed1.5 m/s max
- 2.5–4 hours operationBattery36V 20Ah Li-Ion (runtime not specified)
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 85Environment fit72
- 80Future potential76
- 715 × 1000 × 470 (W × D × H, mm)Footprint54 cm diameter / 30 cm height (base); dual-arm variant TIAGo++ reaches 1.75 m high
Jueying X30 · Best for
Full-station power-substation inspection under 35 minutes covering 90+ equipment pieces per cycle
TIAGO · Best for
Research platform for mobile manipulation and human-robot interaction studies in academic labs
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.