Clearpath Robotics WarthogvsFigure AI Figure 02
Close call. Warthog and Figure 02 trade wins across the matrix.
Warthog
3 wins
Figure 02
0 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 78Deployment readiness78
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 67Price accessibility31
- 65ROI clarity62
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 45Labor replacement72
- 272 kg (600 lb)Payload20 kg (standard); 25 kg (hand-specific carrying capacity)
- 18 km/h (11 mph) on land; 4 km/h in waterSpeed1.2 m/s walking speed; 3 m/s max reported
- 2.5 hours standard (100 Ah, 48V AGM); up to 8 hours with optional Lithium-ion upgradeBattery5 hours continuous operation; 2.25 kWh lithium-ion torso battery with 1.5-hour rapid charging
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 88Environment fit75
- 82Future potential82
- 1,520 × 1,380 × 830 mm (L × W × H)FootprintHeight 168 cm (5'6")
Warthog · Best for
Mining site terrain mapping and remote payload transport across loose gravel and debris
Figure 02 · Best for
Sheet-metal loading in automotive assembly — 2-second cycle precision on BMW X3 production line, 90,000+ parts handled in 11-month pilot
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.