Clearpath Robotics DingovsFigure AI Figure 02

Close call. Dingo and Figure 02 trade wins across the matrix.

Dingo
1 wins
vs
Figure 02
1 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Even
  • 82
    Deployment readiness
    78
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Dingo
  • 81
    Price accessibility
    31
  • 68
    ROI clarity
    62

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

Figure 02
  • 35
    Labor replacement
    72
  • 20 kg (44 lbs)
    Payload
    20 kg (standard); 25 kg (hand-specific carrying capacity)
  • 1.3 m/s
    Speed
    1.2 m/s walking speed; 3 m/s max reported
  • 1–4 hours (lead-acid 1–2 hours, lithium-ion 4 hours)
    Battery
    5 hours continuous operation; 2.25 kWh lithium-ion torso battery with 1.5-hour rapid charging

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Even
  • 88
    Environment fit
    75
  • 76
    Future potential
    82
  • Dingo-D: 551 × 517 × 110 mm; Dingo-O: 686 × 517 × 114 mm
    Footprint
    Height 168 cm (5'6")
Dingo · Best for

Autonomous navigation experiments in confined spaces (hallways, corridors, lab benches)

Figure 02 · Best for

Sheet-metal loading in automotive assembly — 2-second cycle precision on BMW X3 production line, 90,000+ parts handled in 11-month pilot

Final judgment

Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

More head-to-head