Clearpath Robotics DingovsFigure AI Figure 02
Close call. Dingo and Figure 02 trade wins across the matrix.
Dingo
1 wins
Figure 02
1 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 82Deployment readiness78
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 81Price accessibility31
- 68ROI clarity62
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 35Labor replacement72
- 20 kg (44 lbs)Payload20 kg (standard); 25 kg (hand-specific carrying capacity)
- 1.3 m/sSpeed1.2 m/s walking speed; 3 m/s max reported
- 1–4 hours (lead-acid 1–2 hours, lithium-ion 4 hours)Battery5 hours continuous operation; 2.25 kWh lithium-ion torso battery with 1.5-hour rapid charging
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 88Environment fit75
- 76Future potential82
- Dingo-D: 551 × 517 × 110 mm; Dingo-O: 686 × 517 × 114 mmFootprintHeight 168 cm (5'6")
Dingo · Best for
Autonomous navigation experiments in confined spaces (hallways, corridors, lab benches)
Figure 02 · Best for
Sheet-metal loading in automotive assembly — 2-second cycle precision on BMW X3 production line, 90,000+ parts handled in 11-month pilot
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

