Clearpath Robotics DingovsClearpath Robotics Warthog
Close call. Dingo and Warthog trade wins across the matrix.
Dingo
1 wins
Warthog
2 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 82Deployment readiness78
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 81Price accessibility67
- 68ROI clarity65
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 35Labor replacement45
- 20 kg (44 lbs)Payload272 kg (600 lb)
- 1.3 m/sSpeed18 km/h (11 mph) on land; 4 km/h in water
- 1–4 hours (lead-acid 1–2 hours, lithium-ion 4 hours)Battery2.5 hours standard (100 Ah, 48V AGM); up to 8 hours with optional Lithium-ion upgrade
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 88Environment fit88
- 76Future potential82
- Dingo-D: 551 × 517 × 110 mm; Dingo-O: 686 × 517 × 114 mmFootprint1,520 × 1,380 × 830 mm (L × W × H)
Dingo · Best for
Autonomous navigation experiments in confined spaces (hallways, corridors, lab benches)
Warthog · Best for
Mining site terrain mapping and remote payload transport across loose gravel and debris
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.