Bear Robotics Carti 100vsKeenon T10
Keenon T10 leads on 5 of 7 dimensions — strongest on deployment readiness.
Carti 100
0 wins
T10
3 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 72Deployment readiness85
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 30Price accessibility82
- 65ROI clarity78
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 58Labor replacement72
- 220 lbs (100 kg)Payload40 kg (10 kg per tray across 4 layers)
- —Speed0.1–1.0 m/s adjustable; 0.8 m/s at full load on dry road
- up to 10 hours on a single chargeBattery6 hours nominal; up to 10 hours under optimal conditions
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 78Environment fit82
- 70Future potential76
- —Footprint486 × 555 × 1,399 mm (W × D × H)
Carti 100 · Best for
Shelf operations with quick loading and autonomous deployment for rapid productivity gains
T10 · Best for
200+ seat hotpot or casual dining chains during peak dinner service (one robot per 4–5 tables)
Final judgment
If immediate deployment is the priority, choose T10. If the goal is to be ready when Carti 100's capabilities mature, track it.

