Apptronik ApollovsUnitree As2
Close call. Apollo and As2 trade wins across the matrix.
Apollo
0 wins
As2
1 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 72Deployment readiness72
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 54Price accessibility61
- 65ROI clarity58
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 70Labor replacement65
- 25 kg (55 lbs)Payload25 kg (continuous walking); 100 kg (stationary)
- 3.4 km/h (walking speed); 1.5 m/s (5.4 km/h alternative specification)Speed5 m/s (11 mph)
- Up to 4 hours on single battery pack; hot-swappable batteries in under 5 minutes enabling up to 22 hours daily operationBattery4+ hours unloaded (>20 km); 2.5+ hours loaded with 15 kg (~13 km)
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 68Environment fit78
- 75Future potential75
- UnknownFootprint72 cm × 37.8 cm × 45.7 cm (720×378×457 mm, standing)
Apollo · Best for
Warehouse and logistics box/tote picking and transport (primary focus; proven in GXO trials).
As2 · Best for
Industrial inspection and emergency rescue across complex environments
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.