Apptronik ApollovsFourier Intelligence GR-2

Apptronik Apollo leads on 4 of 7 dimensions — strongest on deployment readiness.

Apptronik Apollo
Apptronik
Apollo
$50K–$80K
Fourier Intelligence GR-2
Fourier Intelligence
GR-2
$100K–$150K
Apollo
3 wins
vs
GR-2
0 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Apollo
  • 72
    Deployment readiness
    58
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Apollo
  • 54
    Price accessibility
    32
  • 65
    ROI clarity
    42

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

Apollo
  • 70
    Labor replacement
    35
  • 25 kg (55 lbs)
    Payload
    3 kg (single-arm load capacity)
  • 3.4 km/h (walking speed); 1.5 m/s (5.4 km/h alternative specification)
    Speed
    —
  • Up to 4 hours on single battery pack; hot-swappable batteries in under 5 minutes enabling up to 22 hours daily operation
    Battery
    Up to 2 hours

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Even
  • 68
    Environment fit
    72
  • 75
    Future potential
    78
  • Unknown
    Footprint
    175 cm height
Apollo · Best for

Warehouse and logistics box/tote picking and transport (primary focus; proven in GXO trials).

GR-2 · Best for

Embodied AI research on grasping, force feedback, and sim-to-real transfer

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose Apollo. If the goal is to be ready when GR-2's capabilities mature, track it.

Open interactive comparisonApolloGR-2

More head-to-head