Apptronik ApollovsFigure AI Figure 02

Figure AI Figure 02 leads on 3 of 7 dimensions — strongest on deployment readiness.

Apollo
2 wins
vs
Figure 02
2 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Figure 02
  • 72
    Deployment readiness
    78
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Apollo
  • 54
    Price accessibility
    31
  • 65
    ROI clarity
    62

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

Apollo
  • 70
    Labor replacement
    72
  • 25 kg (55 lbs)
    Payload
    20 kg (standard); 25 kg (hand-specific carrying capacity)
  • 3.4 km/h (walking speed); 1.5 m/s (5.4 km/h alternative specification)
    Speed
    1.2 m/s walking speed; 3 m/s max reported
  • Up to 4 hours on single battery pack; hot-swappable batteries in under 5 minutes enabling up to 22 hours daily operation
    Battery
    5 hours continuous operation; 2.25 kWh lithium-ion torso battery with 1.5-hour rapid charging

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Figure 02
  • 68
    Environment fit
    75
  • 75
    Future potential
    82
  • Unknown
    Footprint
    Height 168 cm (5'6")
Apollo · Best for

Warehouse and logistics box/tote picking and transport (primary focus; proven in GXO trials).

Figure 02 · Best for

Sheet-metal loading in automotive assembly — 2-second cycle precision on BMW X3 production line, 90,000+ parts handled in 11-month pilot

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose Figure 02. If the goal is to be ready when Apollo's capabilities mature, track it.

More head-to-head