Apptronik ApollovsFigure 03

For warehouse and logistics box/tote picking and transport (primary focus; proven in gxo trials)., Apollo is easier to deploy today — 03 is the longer bet on capability.

Apollo
2 wins
vs
03
1 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Apollo
  • 72
    Deployment readiness
    62
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Even
  • 54
    Price accessibility
    80
  • 65
    ROI clarity
    48

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

Apollo
  • 70
    Labor replacement
    71
  • 25 kg (55 lbs)
    Payload
    20 kg total carry payload
  • 3.4 km/h (walking speed); 1.5 m/s (5.4 km/h alternative specification)
    Speed
    1.2 m/s (4.3 km/h)
  • Up to 4 hours on single battery pack; hot-swappable batteries in under 5 minutes enabling up to 22 hours daily operation
    Battery
    approximately 16-hour battery life

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

03
  • 68
    Environment fit
    66
  • 75
    Future potential
    82
  • Unknown
    Footprint
    Unknown
Apollo · Best for

Warehouse and logistics box/tote picking and transport (primary focus; proven in GXO trials).

03 · Best for

Industrial assembly lines and automotive factory floors (BMW partnerships active; controlled environment)

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose Apollo. If the goal is to be ready when 03's capabilities mature, track it.

More head-to-head