Apptronik ApollovsDEEP Robotics DR02

Close call. Apollo and DR02 trade wins across the matrix.

Apollo
2 wins
vs
DR02
1 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Even
  • 72
    Deployment readiness
    72
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Apollo
  • 54
    Price accessibility
    33
  • 65
    ROI clarity
    55

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

Apollo
  • 70
    Labor replacement
    68
  • 25 kg (55 lbs)
    Payload
    20 kg whole-body carrying capacity; 10 kg per arm
  • 3.4 km/h (walking speed); 1.5 m/s (5.4 km/h alternative specification)
    Speed
    1.5 m/s standard walking speed, 4 m/s maximum speed
  • Up to 4 hours on single battery pack; hot-swappable batteries in under 5 minutes enabling up to 22 hours daily operation
    Battery
    unknown

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

DR02
  • 68
    Environment fit
    82
  • 75
    Future potential
    78
  • Unknown
    Footprint
    unknown
Apollo · Best for

Warehouse and logistics box/tote picking and transport (primary focus; proven in GXO trials).

DR02 · Best for

Outdoor security patrols in rain, snow, or dust at industrial sites, power plants, and infrastructure yards

Final judgment

Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

More head-to-head