Aldebaran NAO 6vsUnitree B1
Close call. NAO 6 and B1 trade wins across the matrix.
NAO 6
1 wins
B1
1 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 82Deployment readiness82
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 82Price accessibility35
- 75ROI clarity68
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 35Labor replacement64
- Not applicable (tabletop robot; designed for gesture and interaction, not object carrying)Payload20 kg walking, ~80 kg standing maximum
- 0.6 km/h walking speedSpeed1.2–1.8 m/s
- 60 minutes active use, up to 90 minutes normal use; 90-minute recharge cycleBattery~2 hours continuous walking; up to ~5 hours standing; 1-2 hour recharge
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 88Environment fit88
- 71Future potential72
- 311 × 275 × 574 mm (W × D × H)Footprint1126 × 467 × 636 mm (W × D × H) standing
NAO 6 · Best for
Special education classrooms for autism spectrum support—NAO's predictable, patient interactions help students practice social skills in low-anxiety settings.
B1 · Best for
Perimeter security patrols at industrial plants, utility substations, and campuses—replacing overnight guard rounds
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

