Aldebaran NAO 6vsFourier Intelligence GR-3

Aldebaran NAO 6 leads on 4 of 7 dimensions — strongest on deployment readiness.

Aldebaran NAO 6
Aldebaran
NAO 6
$17K–$20K
Fourier Intelligence GR-3
Fourier Intelligence
GR-3
$28K–$120K
NAO 6
3 wins
vs
GR-3
1 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

NAO 6
  • 82
    Deployment readiness
    72
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

NAO 6
  • 82
    Price accessibility
    49
  • 75
    ROI clarity
    58

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

GR-3
  • 35
    Labor replacement
    45
  • Not applicable (tabletop robot; designed for gesture and interaction, not object carrying)
    Payload
    71 kg total weight; no single-arm lifting capacity disclosed
  • 0.6 km/h walking speed
    Speed
    5 km/h
  • 60 minutes active use, up to 90 minutes normal use; 90-minute recharge cycle
    Battery
    3 hours per charge; dual hot-swappable batteries enable 6 hours continuous operation

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

NAO 6
  • 88
    Environment fit
    78
  • 71
    Future potential
    75
  • 311 × 275 × 574 mm (W × D × H)
    Footprint
    Height 165 cm; width and depth not disclosed
NAO 6 · Best for

Special education classrooms for autism spectrum support—NAO's predictable, patient interactions help students practice social skills in low-anxiety settings.

GR-3 · Best for

Senior living communities: companionship, fall monitoring, medication reminders via natural voice.

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose NAO 6. If the goal is to be ready when GR-3's capabilities mature, track it.

Open interactive comparisonNAO 6GR-3

More head-to-head