Aldebaran NAO 6vsFigure AI Figure 02
Close call. NAO 6 and Figure 02 trade wins across the matrix.
NAO 6
1 wins
Figure 02
1 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 82Deployment readiness78
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 82Price accessibility31
- 75ROI clarity62
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 35Labor replacement72
- Not applicable (tabletop robot; designed for gesture and interaction, not object carrying)Payload20 kg (standard); 25 kg (hand-specific carrying capacity)
- 0.6 km/h walking speedSpeed1.2 m/s walking speed; 3 m/s max reported
- 60 minutes active use, up to 90 minutes normal use; 90-minute recharge cycleBattery5 hours continuous operation; 2.25 kWh lithium-ion torso battery with 1.5-hour rapid charging
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 88Environment fit75
- 71Future potential82
- 311 × 275 × 574 mm (W × D × H)FootprintHeight 168 cm (5'6")
NAO 6 · Best for
Special education classrooms for autism spectrum support—NAO's predictable, patient interactions help students practice social skills in low-anxiety settings.
Figure 02 · Best for
Sheet-metal loading in automotive assembly — 2-second cycle precision on BMW X3 production line, 90,000+ parts handled in 11-month pilot
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

