AgiBot D1vspudu t300

Close call. D1 and t300 trade wins across the matrix.

D1
0 wins
vs
t300
0 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Even
  • 78
    Deployment readiness
    78
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Even
  • 91
    Price accessibility
    76
  • 65
    ROI clarity
    72

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

Even
  • 55
    Labor replacement
    68
  • 8 kg static (10 kg limit); 4 km range with 5 kg payload
    Payload
    300 kg (661 lbs); 400 kg in tow mode
  • 3.7 m/s maximum; 1.8 m/s unloaded range cruising
    Speed
    Maximum 1.2 m/s
  • 200 hours stable operation in extreme conditions (manufacturer lab rating); runtime per charge unknown
    Battery
    12 h (no load), 6 h (fully loaded)

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Even
  • 82
    Environment fit
    80
  • 74
    Future potential
    70
  • 360 × 630 × 420 mm (standing)
    Footprint
    780 × 500 × 1350 mm (W × D × H)
D1 · Best for

Multi-floor security patrols in facilities with stairs, slopes, and cluttered outdoor perimeters (warehouses, construction sites, utility substations)

t300 · Best for

Automotive parts fabrication — autonomous tray delivery between assembly stations (6 h continuous, 400 kg tow mode)

Final judgment

Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

More head-to-head