AgiBot A2vsPAL Robotics TIAGO

AgiBot A2 leads on 5 of 7 dimensions — strongest on deployment readiness.

3 wins

TIAGO

0 wins

Category breakdown

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

87
Deployment readiness
78
60
Maintenance confidence
60
Vision-led navigation (estimated)
Navigation
Vision-led navigation (estimated)
Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Connectivity
Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Even

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

68
Labor replacement
35
15 kg per arm
Payload
70 kg base; 150 kg with AI variant; 3 kg arm fully extended
7 km/h
Speed
1.5 m/s max
700 Wh battery with ~2 hour runtime; 2,000 Wh on industrial A2-W variant
Battery
36V 20Ah Li-Ion (runtime not specified)

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

79
Environment fit
72
84
Future potential
76
Height approximately 1,690–1,750 mm (169–175 cm humanoid frame); width and depth unknown
Footprint
54 cm diameter / 30 cm height (base); dual-arm variant TIAGo++ reaches 1.75 m high

A2 · Best for

200+ seat restaurant chain evening rush service during peak hours (2–4 units per location, ROI ~24 months)

TIAGO · Best for

Research platform for mobile manipulation and human-robot interaction studies in academic labs

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose A2. If the goal is to be ready when TIAGO's capabilities mature, track it.